Menu

Title

Subtitle

Blog Component

Should you buy that travel insurance?

If you're booking a holiday getaway, your travel agent will probably ask if you want to protect your purchase with insurance.Travel web-sitesmake this option an even easier click-to-buy question.

About one in four travelers buys travel insurance, and the coverage has improved considerably since the just-the-basics policies of the 1990s. The terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 added coverage for that eventuality, and the SARS and H1N1 epidemics made coverage for that standard. Hurricanes, natural disasters, tsunamis, and civil unrest, like the Arab Spring in Egypt, are also covered.

Insurers generally offer three classes of policies: basic, mid-level, and premium, with the comprehensiveness of coverage and price increasing accordingly. Cancel-for-any-reason policies give you the most flexibility.

Travel insurance is a comforting concept, but the devil is still in the details, and that creates lots of opportunity for salespeople to sell you false security. To avoid that, size up the deal by asking these 6 key questions:

1. How many choices does the seller give you?If you buy from a travel agent, you'll probably be offered only one or two policies from one company, and "best" typically means bestfor the travel agent,in terms of how much of a commission he or she collects on the sale. Online travel sites also tend to limit your choice.

We likeInsureMyTrip.com, which sells more than 250 polices from 29 different insurance companies. Choice is important because it allows you to buy as many or as few features as you want. If you're not sure what you need, use the websites old-fashioned toll-free number (800-487-4722) to get preciseguidance from one of its live agents.



2. Is this insurancetoocheaply pricedor overpriced?Real travel insurance costs 4 to 8 percent of your pre-paid non-refundable costs. So if your up-frontairlinetickets, resorthotel,cruise, and/or family tour package charges add up to $8,000, travel insurance can cost $320 to $640. Travelers over 40, longer trips, and more comprehensive coverage is priced at the high end. The $10 to $25 impulse purchase policy is very thin on benefits and may only provide death benefits, which you don't need if you have economically priced termlife insurance.

At the other extreme, watch out for overpriced policies, which can appear when your travel agent has a captive customeryou. The best way to know if you're overpaying is to shop around.

For information and advice on all things travel, visit ourTravel & vacation guide.

3. Can you get a pre-existing medical condition waiver?Trip cancellation (before you leave) and trip interruption (during your trip) are key reasons for buying insurance, and 80 percent of claims are related to medical problems. Unexpected injury and illnesses are, of course, covered. But if you consulted your doctor about a problem 60 to 180 days before your trip and that problem comes home to roost after you buy your travel, that would be an excludable pre-existing condition.

To be eligible for a pre-existing medical condition waiver, buy your travel insurance within 7 to 30 days of making your first payment for your travel, says Jim Grace, CEO of InsureMyTrip.com. "If you're 90 years old, get the insurance the same day you buy your trip, just to play it safe," says Grace.

4. Does the policy provide health care?If you're traveling overseas, yourhealth insurancemay or may not cover your care. If you're an older traveler,Medicaretypically doesn't cover you outside the U.S., though some Mediigap policies do. So travel insurance may be a wise buy for its health care benefits, which you can buy as part of a comprehensive policy or a la carte.

Although most trip cancellation/interruption coverage requires little or no deductible, travel health care coverage gives you the option of a zero to $1,000 deductible; of course, the lower the deductible the higher the premium. Be careful about payout limits, too. Some policies limit benefits to $10,000, which may not buy much health care.

5. What about medical evacuation?Medical service is only half of travel health care equation. The other half isgetting tothat medical care. The more adventurous, exotic, and remote your travel is, the more it will cost to transport you to competent medical treatment. After one female tourist was attacked by a lion in Zimbabwe and suffered neck, back, and leg injuries, she needed to be evacuated to Johannesburg, South Africa for surgery via air ambulance, then back home to the U.S. on a commercial flight with a rescue nurse.

A commercial-flight with a rescue nurse can cost $25,000, while an air ambulance can cost $100,000, depending on where you need to be picked up and where you have http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=breast+pumps to go with what type of medical crew. You don't want to pay that bill, and we think medical evac coverage is well worth the price at about $200 to $300 for one trip a la carte and $200 to $250 for an annual plan for frequent travelers.

Your chances of needing such service are remote, of course. Only 5 in 100,000 travelers require out-of-country medical evacuation, says Dr. Roberth Wheeler, chief medical officer of On Call International, a leading provider that arranges for evacuation and care. But 60 million Americans traveled internationally in 2013, and On Call International helped 10,000 of them with its 24-hour 365-days-a-year service, which connects to a network of 4,000 medical facilities and 500 air ambulance and commercial medical transport providers worldwide.

6. Whatdon'tyou need?Dont buy insurance that covers small, manageable losses or only a slice of risk, says Bob Hunter, director of insurance for the Consumer Federation of America. For example, losing some of your belongings wont break you financially, so keep a close eye on your valuables and be ready to accept losing less valuable stuff. Too, if youre worried about dying in a plane crash, buyterm life insurance, which covers you no matter how you die as long as your policy is in force, rather than flight insurance, which only pays benefits if you die in a plane crash and covers you only for the short time you're flying.



Jeff Blyskal (@JeffBlyskalon Twitter)

Visit ourHoliday Gift Ideas pagethroughout the season to find the best deals, time-saving advice, and much more.

Copyright 2005-2014 Consumers Union of U.S., Inc. No reproduction, in whole or in part, without written permission. Consumer Reports has no relationship with any advertisers on this site.

http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2014/11/05/should-buy-that-travel-insurance/

Are We Ready for a Better Breast Pump?

Now let's imagine that we are able to get past these challenges and actually create a better product. The top prototypes featured in the hackathon were designed in theory to give women the option of breast-feeding anywhere and everywhere without it being seen. With all the positives offered from the MIT's Make the Breast Pump Not Suck http://www.webmd.com/parenting/baby/features/breast-pump-guide Hackathon, the common theme of prototypes was discreet, wearable technology.

The idea of the advantages of wearing a discrete wearable breast pump may not always outweigh the circumstances of reality. It's become somewhat of a social taboo. Yes, a mom is not necessarily faced with the same problems as breastfeeding in public; however, there are psychological factors that come into play. I'm surrounded by breastfeeding and pumping advocates and I commonly hear: "if no one can see it or hear it, just do it." However, in reality, the thought of pumping in public without anyone knowing may be uncomfortable for any mom, especially a new one.

As I've been reflecting from this past weekend's Hackathon, this event is a step in the right direction. The power of taking an intimate problem and exposing it nationally will only bring awareness and more possibility for change. Someday we'll make the breast pump not suck.

The designs were convenient and efficient, but are we ready for the technology? Is society willing to accept the change?

Additionally, FDA regulations make a new breast pump prototype a lot more cost prohibitive due to required regulations that could be potentially stifling to new, start-up level companies who are looking to create a better option.

With the first mechanical breast pump patented in the 1920s, today's pump doesn't seem much different from that of the past. It not only lacks the sophistication and convenience of the 21st century, but also considered a despised trapping of modern motherhood. It's loud, uncomfortable, expensive and very inconvenient with no or little options. I agree with the headline on New York Times' Motherlode blog: shouldn't the breast pump be as elegant as an iPhone and as quiet as a Prius by now? The Make the Breast Pump Not Suck Hackathon essentially aimed to reinvent this ever-relevant blast from the past providing a space in which a community of passionate individuals could brainstorm to reinvent the outdated breast pump.

For the most part it was encouraging to see the presence of major breast pump manufacturers such as Medela and Ameda, and the community's desire to listen and create change; however in light of the positive energies, there are challenges in making this idea a reality.

The Affordable Care Act kicked in January 1, 2013 and changed the game for nursing moms. This act made it mandatory for health insurance companies to cover the cost of breast pumps. Although it was considered a huge victory for breastfeeding in the United States, these new laws did not necessarily give moms a choice in quality breast pumps. If insurance companies are already providing the bare minimum, it's doubtful they would then offer this new and improved option. So, women who could not afford the cost of a quality pump may still be faced with paying out of pocket for the best option.

As a former telecommunication sales representative, I imagined myself in this male-dominated workplace wearing a discrete breast pumping bra, similar to the Mighty Mom Utility Belt, the winning prototype from the Hackathon. The Mighty Mom Utility Belt straps at the waist and lets moms pump anywhere with the convenience of bottles and pumps hidden under their blazer. Although it cannot be seen or heard, the thought of wearing this device and breast pumping alongside my co-workers made me uneasy, uncomfortable and paranoid that my breasts might be noticeably moving. It might change everything for new moms, but are all moms ready for this new technology?





This weekend I took part in hacking the breast pump. Yes, as odd as that sounds, more than 150 breast pump users, engineers, designers, health care and lactation specialists, and industry players, including myself, met for two days hacking and collaborating on a much needed makeover for the breast pump. Our goal: to make it more efficient, affordable and comfortable for all moms on the go.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joy-kosak/are-we-ready-for-a-better_b_5901266.html

Obama's Health Care Plan Will Turn Women Into 'Wanton Harlots' | Reuters

With the deficit crisis over and Congress in recess, Stephen Colbert returned to an old stand-by -- health care. The Department of Health and Human Services has stated that health insurance must cover breast feeding, HIV screenings, abuse counseling and other costs of that nature.



Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,Video Archive

Related Articles: Stephen Colbert Gets Fed Approval to Be a Super PAC How Newspapers Covered Health Care

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/04/idUS148476621020110804

"You know the ladies," he quipped. "They are always pumping out breast milk, getting a mani-pedi, having a [cosmopolitan] with their abuse conselor and then picking up some spermicidal [frozen yogurt]."

Worse is the proliferation http://www.toysrus.com/products/medela-breast-pumps.jsp of birth control. On the one hand, Colbert reiterated King's fears that it will prevent an entire generation of Americans from being born and on the other it will turn our daughters "into wanton harlots with an instaiable sexual appetite."

Here's the clip:

The Colbert Report

Like Congressman Steve King (Repub., Iowa), Colbert is outraged, especially because breast pumps and abuse counseling are "frivolous impulse buys" comparably to pedicures and manicures.

Doctors took my breasts, lawyers took my money ..now they've dumped me; JOSEPHINE'S AGONY: Let down by all sides as damages fight collapses.

Refused Legal Aid as husband Matt earned pounds 200-a-week as a petrol pump attendant, Josephine took out a legal insurance policy on the advice of her lawyers. She borrowed pounds 2000 to pay for the policy and was told she was insured for pounds 10,000 which she hoped would cover all the costs.

The law firm McAuley, McCarthy and Co yesterday stood by their position.



But hope came after her story appeared in the Record and a top Scots surgeon offered to properly reconstruct her breasts.

He also http://www.babycenter.com/breastfeeding-breast-pumps suggested there may be a basis for claiming against the surgeon who performed the reconstruction.

Josephine's lawyers were delighted but because Mr Dixon was not a consultant in the 1980s, it was decided to get another opinion.

But after the adverse medical report, cover was withdrawn.

His report gave a tremendous boost to her case, handled by Paisley solicitors McAuley, McCarthy and Co.

Three years ago, the Record told how Josephine, of Barrhead, Renfrewshire, had been left hideously disfigured after having her breasts removed.

Josephine's suffering was made worse after the breast removalwhen she underwent a series of botched operations to reconstruct herbreasts at Canniesburn Hospital, Glasgow.

Doctors attempted to rebuild her breasts from her stomach muscles and skin. It produced horrific results.

A WOMAN whose breasts may have been removed unnecessarily spokeyesterday of her agony as her battle for damages lay in ruins.

Shattered Josephine Day is still paying pounds 35-a-week for the loan she took to pay legal fees.

Josephine said: "This report appears to have put the lawyers off the case.

But the law firm - already paid nearly pounds 3400 - have told her there is no point in pursuing her case.

In tears, Josephine, 49, said: "I feel as though I have been abandoned and let down by just about everyone involved.

She says the surgeon, now retired, did not give her enough detail to make an informed choice.

"As far as I am aware, there was adverse medical evidence. But I cannot comment further because we no longer have the files."

Yesterday, Josephine said: "When Mr Dixon saw the state my body had been left in he was shocked. He was astonished that they had removed both breasts when I didn't even have cancer.



"It's as though the lawyers gave up at the first hurdle. They got their money and that seems to be all that matters."

He said: "Josephine has been let down by the surgeon who performed the operation. All in all, she has been badly let down by the whole system."

"I was never really given any option. I only found out two days later that both breasts had been removed."

She has been trying to sue consultant surgeon James McArthur, who performed the operation at Glasgow's Victoria Infirmary in 1981, ever since.

"But in my opinion, Mr Forrest was a colleague of Mr McArthur so he was never going to criticise him."

"I believe there may be grounds for proceeding against Mr McArthur for performing the original mastectomies without adequately informing Mrs Day of the problems and complication associated with this surgery."

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Doctors+took+my+breasts,+lawyers+took+my+money+..now+they've+dumped...-a062134056

The second surgeon's report was from Sir Patrick Forrest who recalled he had worked alongside Mr McArthur and had great admiration for him. He said Mr McArthur acted properly.

Josephine said: "I don't know what the lawyers did for the past three years to run up bills of more than pounds 3000. All they seemed to do was to write letters."

"If I had known what lay ahead, I would never have had the mastectomy in the first place. And if I had known the complications that can happen with the kind of surgery I was given to reconstruct the breasts, I would never have agreed to it."

Yesterday, Josephine's MP Jim Murphy vowed to raise questions about the case.

As Josephine pursued her claim for damages, Mr Dixon took the unusual step of criticising a fellow surgeon.

She said: "I was told that the only thing to do was to have one breast off. But just before the operation, the surgeon told me if they found lumps on the other breast they would remove it at the same time.

Mr Dixon wrote: "I believe the course of action taken by her doctors was that which no ordinary doctor acting with ordinary care would have taken.

Senior partner Vernie McCusker said: "It may sound glib, but I am not going to work for nothing.

The respected Edinburgh Western Infirmary surgeon, Mike Dixon, was so appalled at her treatment he suggested she sue for damages.

Josephine was only 31 when he removed her breasts because she was in agony from a fibrocystic disease which caused painful lumps in her breasts.

Poll: Vast majority of Americans don't trust the news media

They want to be able to navigate the news app or website easily and quickly, without having to wade through intrusive or annoying ads.

13 sharesfeedbackfeedback to editors

(C) 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Even if it goes against the competitive push to be first, she said, "perhaps there has to be a willingness to wait a little bit to be right,"

http://phys.org/news/2016-04-poll-vast-majority-americans-dont.html

The news media have been hit by a series of blunders on high-profile stories ranging from the Supreme Court's 2012 ruling on President Barack Obama's health care law to the Boston Marathon bombing that have helped feed negative perceptions of the media.

Regardless of what digital site people go to for news, they don't want to be sidetracked by ads that slow load time and impede navigation.

Twitter attracts smaller numbers for news than Facebook, and about 18 percent have a good deal of trust in what they read there. There was also viewer skepticism of other social media sites.

"The skill set that journalists have to master is bigger," said Tom Rosenstiel, executive director of the American Press Institute. That's because the expectations of news consumers have increased.

About 6 in 10 Americans watch, read, or hear news several times a day, as computers, smartphones and tablets make it easier for people to follow the news on an on-demand basis.

The poll shows that accuracy clearly is the most important component of trust.

Nearly 90 percent of Americans say it's extremely or very important that the media get their facts correct, according to the study. About 4 in 10 say they can remember a specific incident that eroded their confidence in the media, most often one that dealt with accuracy or a perception that it was one-sided.



A majority of people get news from social media, most frequently by far from Facebook. "Facebook is the place where everyone is, and so you're not necessarily looking for news, but you're getting it," Rosenstiel.

Respondents were first selected randomly using address-based sampling methods, and later interviewed online or by phone.

Explore further:Online news portals get credibility boost from trusted sources

"In traditional print journalism, the ads were part of the reason that you wanted to leaf through the paper," Sullivan said. "I think they can actually be less unpleasant than they are now, but I also feel strongly they have to be labeled clearly as ads."

More information:Media Insight Project: mediainsight.org/

Readers also are looking for balance: Are there enough sources so they can get a rounded picture of what they are reading? They want transparency, too. "Tell me what you don't know and tell me how you're going about reporting the story," she said.

Just 6 percent of people say they have a lot of confidence in the media, putting the news industry about equal to Congress and well below the public's view of other institutions. In this presidential campaign year, Democrats were more likely to trust the news media than Republicans or independents.

Rosenstiel said people who use social media are "hunting pretty carefully for cues" in deciding whether to click on an item of news to read more. The most important factor in determining trust: whether or not they know the original source of the story.

Faced with ever-increasing sources of information, Americans also are more likely to rely on news that is up-to-date, concise and cites expert sources or documents, according to a study by the Media Insight Project, a partnership of The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and the American Press Institute.

Yet only 12 percent of those who use Facebook say they have a lot of trust in the news and information they see on the site.

"The most important thing that news organizations can do is be accurate, and while we know that is a high value, this study reinforces that," said Margaret Sullivan, public editor of The New York Times.

Sullivan said maximizing reader trust is both good journalism and good business. "For news organizations that want to be taken seriously, there is real opportunity here and real help," she said.



The poll of 2,014 adults was conducted Feb. 18-March 21 with funding from the American Press Institute. It used a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for all respondents is plus or minus 2.9 percentage points.

This poses a conundrum for publishers, Rosenstiel said, as they try to balance the demands of advertisers and the needs of their audience, who might just leave the site if they find the experience frustrating.

Poll: Vast majority of Americans don't trust the news media

Poll: Vast majority of Americans don't trust the news mediaIn this Dec. 17, 2014, file photo, White House press secretary Josh Earnest takes questions during the daily briefing at the White House in Washington. Trust in the news media is being eroded by perceptions of inaccuracy and bias, fueled in part by Americans' skepticism about what they read on social media. Just about 6 percent of people say they have a lot of confidence in the media, putting the news industry about equal to Congress and well below the public's view of other institutions. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)

Trust in the news media is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breast_pump being eroded by perceptions of inaccuracy and bias, fueled in part by Americans' skepticism about what they read on social media.

African-Americans, Hispanics, and people following stories about crime and public safety are particularly likely to say it's very important to see their communities and people who looked like them represented in reporting.

But trust today also goes beyond the traditional journalistic principles of accuracy, balance and fairness.

In 2014, Rolling Stone had to retract a vivid report about an alleged gang rape at a fraternity party at the University of Virginia. The Columbia Graduate School of Journalism, asked by Rolling Stone to investigate after questions were raised about the veracity of the story, called it an avoidable journalistic failure and "another shock to journalism's credibility amid head-swiveling change in the media industry."

Looking For A Breast Pump? Try Avent Isis Manual

Avent Isis manual breast pump, ready to use

Photo credit

Ooops.. my Avent pump also makes a knocking sound though, but this one only happens when I pump with maximum suction, such that the pump piston hits my breast milk container.

Pros No 3: Avent manual breast pump is cheap and very affordable

Yes, this is one more reason why I am very happy with my Avent manual breast pump. It's worth your money and it won't burn a hole in your pocket. Not convinced that Avent Isis manual breast pump is worth your penny? Check out the price!

More over, Avent Isis manual breast pump comes with the soft-petal cushion which makes your pumping experience more convenient. Avent claims that this cushion helps initiating let down (when the milk starts flowing) since it resembles baby suckling pattern. Ok, I am not going to support this claim, but based on my experience, I could initiate my let down simply by putting this cushion on my breast pump. Of course, when I knew there are a lot more faster ways to initiate let down, I quickly switch to another method to get let down faster.



Avent manual breast pump is light and portable. I love the fact that I can dump it into my Pigeon fridge-to-go cooler bag together with my Avent VIA breast milk storage system, without the need to use a separate bag. How would you do that for an electric breast pump? Of course you can't because they come with more parts, battery, power cord, etc etc.

http://hubpages.com/family/breast-pump3

As a manual pump, Avent Isis manual breast pump is a lot more quieter than regular electric pump. This is a very nice feature because it allows you to pump beside your sleeping baby, in the office, or while traveling.

Forget a painful milk expressing experience. You are the one controlling the suction that you give to your breast. So, you choose, whether you need a http://www.bedbathandbeyond.com/1/3/breast-pumps soft yet fast suction, or strong but a steady one. This is very important when you try mimicking how our baby nurses, begin by quick-light suction for a minute or two, and then deep and slow suction.

Forget painful milk expressing experience. You are the one controlling the suction with Avent manual breast pump. You choose, whether you need a soft yet fast or strong and steady suction. This is very important to mimick how our baby nurse, which is usually starts with fast nibbling-kind of movement, followed by deep and strong suction.

Philips Avent manual breast pump

Photo credit

Avent Isis manual breast pump is very easy to use. It only contains a few parts:

the pump body,the let-down massage cushion,the diaphragm,the white valve, andthe handle

to construct the pump. By simply following the user manual, you can assemble it in seconds. When not in used, you can keep your Avent manual breast pump clean and sterilized since it comes with a funnel cover (to cover the pump body) and a sealing base to cover the bottom part of the pump.

Avent Isis Manual Breast Pump in the Box

Photo credit



My Personal Review of Avent Isis Manual Breast Pump

Are you looking for a breast pump? Let me recommend you AVENT Isis manual breast pump. Avent Isis manual breast pump is a very affordable breast pump which helps you to express your breast milk efficiently.

However, I notice that my Avent Isis manual pump makes a squeaky sound occasionally, which occurs if the pump parts (especially the diaphragm) are wet or there's some water trapped inside. But this one is pretty easy to fix, just wipe all parts dry after each pumping and you won't get any more trouble.

I bought my Avent manual breast pump on September 2010, when I was pregnant with my first child and I still use it till today, April 2014, almost 4 years later. I have tried different brands of breast pump, but still, it is the Avent manual breast pump that wins my heart.

In this page I'll tell you a detailed reviews about my Avent Isis manual breast pump, some positive and negative sides, plus some tips how to use your Avent Isis manual breast pump.

Women’s preventative care widely expanded

It should also be noted that almost all current health insurance plans already cover prescription contraceptives with varying co-pays. Still, in a nod to religious and social conservatives, the new rules issued yesterday also include a provision that will permit religious institutions to opt out of offering birth control coverage, although many of them have stated that they feel the conscience clause is insufficient. As a result Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.) is seeking to promote new legislation that would codify a range of exceptions to the new health care law on conscious and religious grounds.

50 years after the pill revolutionized womens healthcare, the Obama administration has announced a new era in which birth control will now be considered preventative treatment to be covered under health insurance plans with no co-pays (although exceptions may still be made in some cases for brands for which a generic is available).

As a result of yesterdays move, birth control in all forms approved by the FDA, including the pill, intrauterine devices, the morning after pill and newer forms of long-acting hormonal contraceptives will now be covered without additional charges, as are at least one annual well woman screening for the virus that causes cervical cancer for women 30 years old and up, annual HIV counseling and screening, along with annual STD counseling. Prenatal screenings for diabetes, as well as support for nursing moms (including breast pumps) will also be covered. In addition, services involving domestic violence counseling have also been included this broad expansion of womens preventative care under the Presidents overhaul of health care. The package, will go into effect January 1, 2013, is expected to (initially) benefit tens of millions of women.

Since birth control is the most common drug prescribed for women, health plans sgould make sure it is readily available, stated Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. Not doing it would be like not covering flu shots.

Those seeking more information about birth control and family planning http://www.best-breast-pumps.com/ can contact Planned Parenthood of Southern New England at 335 Whitney Ave., New Haven, CT 06511 203 865-5158.



For a related article please check out http://www.examiner.com/wellness-in-hartford/beware-of-bogus-birthcontro...

http://www.examiner.com/article/women-s-preventative-care-widely-expanded

U.S. Moms Don't Breast-Feed Long Enough

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=117395

More than 70 percent of American women don't follow new recommendations that they exclusively breast-feed their babies for the first six months.

Should they?

Lactation experts say marketing pressure by infant formula companies, lack of social support and workplaces that don't encourage the behavior make it difficult for American mothers to meet the recommendations by the World Health Organization.

But formula companies, which have a $1 billion revenue market in the United States, disagree, saying they do recommend breast-feeding.

WHO last month called on countries to "protect, promote and supportexclusive breast-feeding for six months" and to continue breast-feeding for children with supplemental foods "up to 2 years of age or beyond."

Breast Milk Is a Complete Food

Research WHO commissioned showed exclusive breast-feeding for six months, without supplemental formula, decreases diarrhea and respiratory and ear infections, and improves brain growth.

Yet only 29 percent of American women either breast-feed or give formula to their babies by the age of 6 months. The number of exclusive breast-feeders is even smaller since data in the United States is only kept on both activities, not each one separately.

While the American Academy of Pediatrics agrees with the WHO guidelines, the U.S. surgeon general says four months might be good enough.

Healthy People 2010 goals, an initiative of the U.S. Public Health Service, say the proportion of women who breast-feed for six months should increase to 50 percent by 2010, but the guidelines don't specifically define breast-feeding as exclusive or not.

Formula Pressures

La Leche League International, a mothers' advocacy group, says moms should do what they want to.

"We tell mothers that six months is what the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends for those mothers who can breast-feed, but they should do what feels right for them," says Kim Cavaliero, spokeswoman for La Leche International.

"We're happy as long as breast-feeding is an important element in the baby's life."

But exclusive breast-feeding advocates say aggressive marketing by infant formula manufacturers and social pressures make it difficult for women to give their babies what they need.



Barbara Heiser, executive director of the National Alliance of Breastfeeding Advocacy in Ellicott City, Md., says it is not surprising American mothers don't exclusively breast-feed, given how formula companies bombard them.

She says formula companies target new mothers before and after they deliver their babies. They buy lists from maternity stores and send coupons for formula to homes, she says.

Aggressive Marketing

Then they provide free so-called starter samples, bottles, nipples, tape measures, pens and posters to hospitals to give to the mothers, she says. After the mothers leave, the firms do follow-up surveys at home.

"These are unfair marketing techniques," says Heiser. "How can a message of exclusive breast-feeding compete against that when a mother's hormones are raging and a health-care professional offers her a product? Hospitals should not accept these products for free and should pay for formula as they do medicine and food."

The formula industry says it supports breast-feeding and that alleged pressure by the firms is not responsible for mothers using formula.

"Studies show that providing a formula sample does not alter a mother's practice," says Mardi Mountford, executive director of the International Formula Council, a trade organization for formula manufacturers in Atlanta. "Moms make up their mind to breast-feed, use formula or do both before they have a baby."

Mountford says the firms she represents discuss breast-feeding in educational material and says product labels say breast-feeding offers the best nutrition for infants.



One Area of Agreement

While they disagree on formula issues, breast-feeding advocates and Mountford agree our society is not accommodating toward breast-feeding.

"Social support is very important," Mountford says, adding that it varies among cultures. "Breast-feeding when a woman goes back to work is still very difficult in this country."

"Mothers are still embarrassed to breast-feed in public places," says Marcia Walker, a certified lactation consultant who works in the Boston area, "and most workplaces are not supportive of breast-feeding."

Walker says fewer than 30 states have laws protecting women from harassment for breast-feeding and says companies could benefit economically if they were more breast-feeding friendly, letting moms pump their milk when they need to, not when companies say it's OK.

"Firms could save money http://www.medelabreastfeedingus.com/products/category/breast-pumps on health insurance claims and absenteeism since breast-fed babies are healthier," Walker says. "We are trying to help remove barriers to help women make the best decision for their babies."

Breast Pumps Haven't Changed In 20 Years, Until Now

Breast pumps today are outdated, but necessary. Thats why one company has reimagined a new and improved version that will revolutionize the way mothers pump milk.



babyation breast pump

Not only that, but the new breast pump has a completely different design that will allow mothers to pump comfortably and discreetly anywhere, anytime. Instead of having the bottles hang off the breasts, the new design uses breast shields that can fit inside a bra.

The company was initially inspired to create a new breast pump after one of its founders read a New York Times blog that posed the question: shouldn't the breast pump be as elegant as an iPhone and quiet as a Prius by now?

Babyation argues that this literally creates a barrier between a woman and the world around her at work, home or anywhere in between. So the company is introducing its new design, which has been validated by a pediatrician, who is also a lactation consultant, through the Kickstarter campaign.

The breast pump was invented in 1854. Originally, they were only available in hospitals to help women with inverted nipples or to help feed premature babies.

View post on imgur.com

The product used today only became widely available to mothers 20 years ago. But the actual pump hasn't changed much since. Pumps are loud, and they force mothers to retreat to a private area and take off their shirt before using.

After spending two years refining their design, Babyation created a prototype and launched a Kickstarter campaign to make its invention a reality. So far, the company has made $39,000 of the $50,000 goal.

If the new product hits the market next year as planned, the only downside will be its cost.

Since then, Babyation has been determined to come up with a solution to the outdated product.

The company Babyation has invented a breast pump for modern, superhero moms because its 2016. The reimagined product was truly made for the modern http://breastpumps.com/ woman, as it can be controlled through an app on your smart phone and is completely customizable.

Take a look at the comparison:

Mashable reports that the new pump will cost roughly $584. Babyation co-founder Sam Rudolph said, Our research has indicated that moms will be willing to pay a slight premium for the revolutionary features our pump offers.

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/03/17/breast-pump-babyation_n_9486482.html

Victoria Secret Body Shapers For Women

Another Victoria secret body shapers is the push up slip with panty. This gives a firm control of the tummy, waist and hips. This is perfect for women who want the hour-glass shape under dresses and skirts. The breasts appear lifted and the panty will lift the bottom to give a sweetheart shape. This is also another step into under garment.

The Victoria secret body shapers is ideal for women as they can accentuate their figures by lifting and pushing body parts for a slimmer and sexier appearance. By wearing Victoria secret body shapers is a simple but easy trick to enhance a womans beauty and a wonderful confidence boost as well. Remember these days body shapers are much sexier than before and are by no means should you be embarrassed about just by wearing them. So the next time you want https://www.lansinoh.com/ to wear that sexy dress enhance your silhouette with Victoria secret body shapers.



The Victoria secret body shapers are an easy resolution for controlling bulges on the tummy, waist, thighs and bottom. The design of the shaper wear will give a slimmer and more curvaceous look to your problem area. Nowadays these under garments are much sexier compared to the girdles our great grandmothers wore. Corsets and under wear in those days were extremely tight, uncomfortable, stiff, coarse and ugly. In addition, they were easily noticeable underneath clothing. The Victoria secret body shapers is comfortable and is even perfect for daily use.

Victoria secret body shapers offer a variety of lingerie for women to choose from. A popular lingerie choice for the upper body is the top slimming tank. This offers medium control of your tummy, waist and upper back. It gives your mid section a stream-lined look. This is definitely a must have for tight-fitting tops.

The Victoria secret body shapers line has a variety of under garments to choose from to suit whatever need you may have. The most popular choice is a shaper brief. The design of the brief will flatten the tummy while narrowing the waist for a sleek figure. It will also lift your bum cheeks which is important when wearing body hugging clothes. The Victoria secret body shaper offers briefs in firm or medium control. The medium control under wear will smooth your waist, tummy and upper back. The mid section of the back is also shaped and stream-lined to prevent bra bulge. The material used to make the shapers are usually nylon and spandex. Victoria secret body shapers use spandex as it a wonderful material that compresses your bulging areas while still letting your circulation flow normally.

A figure cupped shaping slip will help women who want to look good in a tight-fitting dress. This Victoria secret body shapers give the breast a lift while at the same time shaping the tummy waist, hips and thighs. The advantage of this garment is that you just need to step into it to put on. So this will not mess your make up nor will it undo your hair style.

http://www.infobarrel.com/Victoria_Secret_Body_Shapers_For_Women

View older posts »